YouTube documents a specific iOS calculation for Super Chats: creators receive 70% of confirmed Supers revenue after local sales tax and iOS App Store fees are deducted. That means the share is not automatically 70% of the viewer’s full payment.
That does not establish one universal mobile rate or a complete comparison between iOS, Android and other purchase routes. YouTube’s Android billing notice describes where some purchases are billed, not how creator proceeds are calculated.
Does YouTube take a different cut on mobile?
The clearest answer is: on iOS, YouTube says it deducts local sales tax and App Store fees before calculating the creator’s 70% share of confirmed Supers revenue. YouTube does not publish a universal mobile percentage or provide enough information in these pages to calculate a fixed mobile-versus-other payout difference.
The order matters. If you interpret 70% as a share of the viewer’s total checkout payment on iOS, you may overstate what the documented formula says. The stated base is what remains after the named deductions, not necessarily the original amount paid.
This distinction is useful whether you run a devotional channel with live bhajans, a local news stream or a small business broadcast. A viewer can make a purchase from a phone, but the public documentation does not let you infer every fee or compare every route from the device alone. Start with the specific policy YouTube does state, then avoid filling gaps with assumptions.
YouTube’s language also matters: it refers to confirmed Supers revenue. It is not a promise that every amount a viewer attempts to send will appear as creator revenue. For channel-specific contractual terms, YouTube directs creators to their applicable partner agreement in Studio.
The documented iOS creator share
YouTube Help states that creators receive 70% of Supers revenue confirmed by Google, with the 70% calculated after local sales tax and App Store fees on iOS are deducted. The statement covers Supers, which includes Super Chat and Super Stickers in the relevant help material. Read the YouTube Super Chat and Super Stickers policy for its current wording.
The practical formula is therefore an order of operations, not a stand-alone promise about the viewer’s payment: establish confirmed revenue, remove the stated iOS deductions, then apply the stated 70% share. The source does not supply a universal App Store fee rate, nor does it give a worked example that can be applied across countries and purchase amounts.
That is why a creator should not convert the policy into a claim such as “I get exactly 70% of every Super Chat paid on an iPhone.” The documented calculation specifically places the tax and iOS App Store fee deductions before the share is applied. The amount left as the calculation base can depend on facts not captured by a single general percentage.
YouTube’s broader partner earnings overview describes the Commerce Product Module as paying 70% of net revenues for channel memberships, Super Chat, Super Stickers and Super Thanks. It also says your own agreement can be viewed in YouTube Studio. See the partner earnings overview if you need the wider partner-program context. A summary of a general policy is not a substitute for checking the agreement that applies to your channel.
Which deductions come before the share?
For the documented iOS case, the named deductions are local sales tax and App Store fees. YouTube says these are deducted before applying the creator’s share. The wording does not say that the App Store fee has one fixed rate worldwide, and it does not identify a dollar amount that can be used for every viewer’s purchase.
Sales tax is local, so even the tax element is not a single fixed input for all viewers. The source’s point is the sequence: account for local sales tax and the specified iOS fee first, then calculate the creator share from the remaining confirmed Supers revenue. It does not provide a ready reckoner for creators to use when predicting every transaction.
For example, a channel owner should avoid taking the amount shown in a viewer-facing context and simply multiplying by 70% as a precise payout forecast for an iOS purchase. That shortcut leaves out the documented prior deductions and may also mix up a displayed purchase amount with the revenue base in YouTube’s statement. Without the relevant tax and fee details, the exact result cannot be reconstructed from the public help page alone.
This is not a reason to stop offering Super Chat or to assume the least favourable outcome. It is a reason to keep estimates labelled as estimates and to use actual transaction and earnings records for reconciliation. If you publish amounts for Indian viewers, the guide to setting Super Chat amounts for Indian viewers can help with the separate question of choosing visible purchase levels; it does not replace YouTube’s payout terms.
Transaction costs YouTube says it covers
YouTube says transaction costs, including credit-card fees, are currently covered by YouTube. Keep that separate from the named iOS App Store deduction. The two statements concern different things: one names costs YouTube says it covers, while the other specifies deductions taken before the iOS creator share is calculated.
It would be inaccurate to collapse these into “all fees are deducted from the creator’s share” or into “there are no costs before the share.” The help page identifies the App Store fee and local tax for iOS, while it says YouTube covers transaction costs such as card fees. It does not provide a full ledger of every payment component for every route.
The word “currently” also signals that this is a policy statement that could change. If a change would materially affect your channel’s planning, check the live Help page and the terms in YouTube Studio rather than relying indefinitely on an old screenshot, a forum answer or a calculation passed between creators.
If you run a continuous channel, Super Chat is only one part of the operating picture. A live stream’s stability and its monetisation are separate problems: advice on what happens if a church’s 24/7 stream key changes concerns broadcast continuity, while the revenue-share policy concerns confirmed Supers proceeds. Keeping those questions distinct makes it easier to investigate an earnings discrepancy without confusing it with stream delivery.
What the Android billing notice does and does not establish
YouTube’s buyer Help page says some new purchases made through the YouTube Android app are billed through Google Play. It says the change affects where the purchase is billed, not pricing or cost. The notice is about buyer billing arrangements, not a published creator-side revenue calculation. See YouTube’s page on buying a Super Chat or Super Sticker on iPhone and iPad, which includes the Android billing notice.
That notice does not say that Android creators receive a different share, that Google Play fees are deducted from a creator’s proceeds, or that no such costs can be relevant. It also does not give an Android-specific formula corresponding to YouTube’s explicit iOS wording. Those conclusions would go beyond what the notice establishes.
It is tempting to treat “billed through Google Play” as an answer to the creator’s revenue question. It is only an answer about the billing route described in that notice. Billing location, displayed price and the calculation of confirmed creator revenue are related topics, but a statement about one does not fill in the other two.
If you are comparing a particular Android purchase with one made on an iPhone, you need transaction-specific detail that the cited public note does not provide. Do not tell viewers that one mobile platform necessarily costs them more, or tell co-creators that one platform necessarily reduces creator proceeds by a known amount, on the basis of this notice alone.
Why not to generalise across mobile purchases
“Mobile” is a device category, not a single revenue rule in the cited documentation. The iOS help page names the App Store fee as a prior deduction. The Android note says some app purchases are billed via Google Play and describes a change in billing source. Neither page provides a complete, quantified platform-by-platform calculation.
There are other variables as well. Local tax treatment can differ, and the relevant transaction may have a particular billing path. YouTube’s broader policy uses the term net revenues for the Commerce Product Module, while the specific Supers help page explains the iOS sequence. A short social-media claim that “YouTube takes the same cut everywhere” or “YouTube takes more on every phone” collapses those distinctions.
A cautious comparison should separate what is documented from what is unknown:
| Purchase context | What YouTube documents | What the documentation does not establish |
|---|---|---|
| iOS Super Chat or other Supers | 70% of confirmed Supers revenue after local sales tax and iOS App Store fees are deducted | A universal App Store fee rate or a fixed payout for every country and amount |
| Some purchases in the YouTube Android app | Billing through Google Play; the notice says the change affects where billing comes from, not pricing or cost | An Android-specific creator-share formula or a quantified difference from iOS |
| General partner terms | The Commerce Product Module summary describes 70% of net revenues for listed fan-funding features | The exact result for an individual purchase without its applicable terms and transaction details |
Use the table as a boundary on claims, not as a calculator. It summarises what the cited pages say and where they stop. If someone gives you a precise comparison, ask which official policy and transaction details support it.
For an individual channel, the partner agreement and YouTube Studio are the sensible place to check applicable contractual details. For a buyer’s billing question, use the relevant purchase details page. Do not assume that a general policy summary answers a creator-specific settlement question, or that a buyer receipt shows the creator’s net share.
Where to check purchase billing details
If your question is about what a viewer was charged or how to find a purchase record, use YouTube’s buyer-facing purchase information rather than trying to infer it from your creator payout. The Help page for Super Chat and Super Sticker purchase details on iPhone and iPad explains buyer-side details and related conditions. This is useful for checking a receipt or understanding the purchase flow, not for calculating a creator’s net revenue from a single amount.
If your question is about your own share, review the applicable terms in YouTube Studio and the current YouTube Help page for Supers. Keep records of the payment context and the amount confirmed in your reporting, then compare like with like. A viewer-facing payment amount and a creator-side confirmed revenue figure are not automatically identical bases.
For channels whose main job is keeping a prerecorded programme live, monetisation questions should not distract from the separate operating choice. If a home PC interruption is the recurring risk, the guide to creating a continuous YouTube livestream with FFmpeg on Windows in India addresses a different practical layer: keeping the programme running. No streaming method changes the policy calculation described above.
The useful habit is to save the source page and date when you review the rules, and to revisit it when YouTube updates its wording or your own terms change. That is more reliable than applying a creator’s anecdotal payout from another country, purchase route or agreement to your channel. It also makes it easier to explain to a moderator or finance colleague which part of the answer is documented and which part still needs transaction-specific confirmation.
If you are deciding how to keep a continuous channel operating, compare the ongoing workflow with your existing setup rather than treating a monetisation policy as a streaming recommendation.
Before committing, compare the operating options on the pricing page. When the file and channel are ready, start free — 24-hour trial, no card.
FAQ
Does a creator get 70% of the full iPhone Super Chat payment?
Not according to the wording of YouTube’s iOS calculation. YouTube says local sales tax and App Store fees are deducted first, and the 70% share applies to confirmed Supers revenue after those deductions. It does not publish a universal fee rate or worked amount for every purchase.
Does the Android Google Play notice prove creators receive a different share?
No. The notice says some Android app purchases are billed through Google Play and that the change affects where billing comes from, not pricing or cost. It does not state an Android creator-share formula or quantify a difference from iOS.
Does YouTube deduct credit-card fees from the creator share?
YouTube says transaction costs, including credit-card fees, are currently covered by YouTube. That statement should not be confused with the local tax and App Store deductions it names for iOS. Check the current Help page because the policy wording may change.
Where can I confirm the terms for my channel?
Review the applicable partner agreement in YouTube Studio and compare it with YouTube’s current Help documentation. The public summary is useful for understanding the general policy, but your agreement and transaction records are the better references for your own channel’s details.